Paradigm Initiative (PIN), has asked Federal High Court sitting in Abuja to determine whether NITDA has the powers to propose or formulate any regulation, which in any way purports to dictate the protection of personal data in Nigeria.
Judith Ogutu, Communications Manager, Paradigm Initiative, in statement on Monday said that this has become imperative due to the growing number of people with access to the internet and the increasing usage of digital technology and the need to develop more laws and policies to accommodate these issues.
According to the statement, “The growing number of people with access to the internet and the increasing usage of digital technology in business, healthcare, commerce, banking, and other parts of the economy has created the need to develop more laws and policies around these issues.
Read Also: NFW 2022: Financial literacy, crucial to closing financial exclusion gap – CEO, 9PSB
“However, the power of an agency to make laws and policies on any issues must be given by law and in ensuring the rule of law is adhered to, we have asked the Federal High Court in Abuja to determine the following questions:
- Whether the National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA) has the powers to propose or formulate any regulation, framework or guideline which directs or purports to direct, mandate or purport to mandate, dictates or purports to dictate the protection of personal data in Nigeria.
- Whether the National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA) possesses the powers to propose or formulate any regulation, framework and guideline which directs or purports to direct, mandates or purports to mandate, dictates or purports to dictate the issuance and enforcement of sanctions for non-compliance thereto.
“These questions are important for existing and future policy and regulation formulation as they ensure that responses to emerging threats are meticulous and effective. Actions mandated by laws are legitimized by the people and have contingencies to possible issues. Any agency acting beyond legal authority puts the people and the aspect of governance under their mandate at risk.
“As a regulatory agency, NITDA is a creation of the law and as an organization that enforces the law, it must not be seen to act outside limits of the law.
“This suit is without prejudice to NITDA’s ongoing attempt to amend its laws to give it additional powers and to legitimize actions it already undertook within its existing mandate.
“It is our prerogative to see the rule of law adhered to especially by regulatory agencies of government as we await the determination of the suit”.
However, representatives of NITDA could not immediately be reached for comment.
